← Changelog

Plan a project or run a meeting, together

Planning usually splits the conversation from the result. You meet, talk it through, then someone writes it up afterward, and what you agreed slowly drifts from what gets done. Plan it together closes that gap, so the session itself produces the plan, the project, or the meeting outcomes, grounded in your own strategy.

What shipped. Run “Plan it together” as a live session to do more than a plan. Start a project from a session and Throughline drafts its action plan from what the room actually decided. Or run a meeting from your own topics, and the decisions and action items come out already captured and assigned. Every prompt in the room is drawn from your own strategy, with the source named.

How Throughline treats planning. Planning should not be a meeting followed by homework. The gap between the conversation and the write-up is where alignment leaks out and good decisions get watered down. So the session is the artifact. What the room decides becomes the project, the plan, or the meeting record on the spot, and because every prompt is pulled from your goals, the table weighs real options instead of a blank page or generic advice.

What you and your org get. For the people in the room, the work leaves with them already drafted, instead of waiting on someone to type it up. For the org, everyone planned from the same strategy at the same time, so alignment is built in and the plan stays tied to the numbers it is meant to move. Less drift, less lost work, and a decision the whole room can watch turn into action.