Strategy reset
Strategy reset:
when the plan stops working.
A strategy reset is a deliberate stop, usually one day for the leadership team, to decide whether the current strategy still fits what is really happening and, if not, what replaces it. It starts from what broke, not from last year's plan. The purpose stays; the bets change. A good reset names the real problem, makes a new call, decides what stops to pay for it, and gives every surviving priority an owner. It is bigger than a quarterly review and smaller than a pivot.
TL;DR
- Length
- One full day for most teams. Half a day when the direction is already clear.
- When
- As soon as the signs agree, not at the next planning cycle.
- Who attends
- The leadership team, the finance lead, the sharpest critic, and someone close to customers.
- What you leave with
- The new direction in one sentence, what stops, and an owner and a date on every priority.
Build your reset agenda.
Start today, or put the prep dates in your calendar.
When is it?
Which month?
Who's working on it?
What a strategy reset is
Every strategy rests on a few beliefs: about customers, about competitors, about what the company can do well. A reset is what you run when one of those beliefs has turned out to be wrong, and the plan built on it no longer makes sense.
Richard Rumelt, in Good Strategy Bad Strategy, describes the core of any strategy in three parts: a diagnosis of what is going on, a guiding policy for dealing with it, and a set of coherent actions that carry the policy out1. A reset rebuilds all three, and it starts with the diagnosis. Most failed resets skip that step and jump straight to new goals.
(You may also see "strategic reset" used in foreign policy. This guide is about companies and nonprofits.)
Stay the course, adjust, reset or pivot?
These four get mixed up, and the mix-up is costly. Calling a pivot a "reset" undersells the change. Calling an adjustment a "reset" wears people out.
| What changes | What stays | Typical trigger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stay the course | Nothing but effort and timing | The strategy and the priorities | Results are behind, but the early signs are moving the right way |
| Adjust | One priority, a target, or the order of work | The diagnosis and the direction | One bet is off, the rest are holding |
| Reset | The diagnosis, the main bets, and what gets funded | The purpose, the customers you serve, most of the team | A core belief behind the plan has proved wrong |
| Pivot | The business itself: product, customer or model | The team and what it has learned | The business as designed cannot work |
Eric Ries, in The Lean Startup, describes a pivot as a structured change of course to test a new basic hypothesis about the product, the strategy or how the business grows2. A reset is one step short of that. You still serve the same purpose and mostly the same customers. You change how you intend to win.
Strategy reset vs annual planning
| Annual planning | Strategy reset | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts from | Where you are and where you want to be next year | What broke and why |
| Timing | Fixed, on the calendar | When the signs say so |
| Main question | What should next year deliver? | Is the plan still true, and what replaces it? |
| Most time goes on | Goals, budgets and targets | The real problem, the new call, and what stops |
| Hardest part | Saying no to good ideas | Stopping work people have invested in |
If your planning day is coming up anyway, see the annual planning page. If the plan is not working now, do not wait for it.
When to call a strategy reset
Call one when the plan is describing a company you no longer are: a number that missed twice, a market that moved, a bet that stopped paying. Waiting for the annual cycle means months more of every team working to a plan nobody believes.
A reset is a different day from annual planning. It starts from what is not working, so most of the time goes on naming what changed and deciding what stops, the way a mid-year strategy review should but rarely does.
Early signs and late signs
Missed numbers are late signs. By the time revenue or margin shows the problem, the cause is usually two or three quarters old. Look for the early signs, the ones that move before the results do.
| Early signs (move first) | Late signs (confirm it) |
|---|---|
| Win rates, deal size or sales cycle length changing | Revenue below plan two periods in a row |
| A new kind of competitor showing up in lost deals | Market share falling |
| Customers asking for something your plan does not cover | Churn or lapsed donors rising |
| A priority that keeps slipping for the same reason | Margin shrinking despite cost work |
| Your best people quietly moving off the key bet | Leaders openly doubting the plan |
| Frontline staff describing the market differently from the plan | The board or funders asking for a new plan |
Andy Grove, who led Intel through its exit from memory chips, called the moment when a business's basic rules change a strategic inflection point. He noted that the people who see it first are often middle managers and sales staff, not the top team, because they are closest to the change3. Ask them before you decide the plan is fine.
Is it the strategy, or the way it is being carried out?
Before calling a reset, check whether the plan is wrong or just not being done. The fixes are different. A reset will not help a team that never started the plan.
| Test | Points to execution | Points to strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Did the teams do what the plan asked? | No, or only in part | Yes, and it still did not work |
| Where it was done well, did it work? | Yes | No, not even there |
| Can managers name the top priorities? | No | Yes |
| Are the beliefs behind the plan still true? | Yes | At least one has failed |
The third test matters more than it looks. In Donald Sull, Rebecca Homkes and Charles Sull's 2015 study of 7,600 managers in 262 companies, only 55% of middle managers could name even one of their company's top five priorities4. If your managers cannot name the plan, a new plan will not fix that. Run the execution fixes first, or at least alongside.
Why leaders call a reset too late
Almost every reset is called later than it should have been. That is not a character flaw. It is well-studied human behavior, and knowing the forces makes them easier to resist.
- Escalation of commitment. In a 1976 experiment, Barry Staw found that people put the most new money into a failing course of action when they had been personally responsible for choosing it5. The leader who launched the plan is the person most likely to fund it past the point of sense. A group does not correct this: Sunstein and Hastie report research finding that groups are even more likely than individuals to stay with a failing course10.
- Sunk cost. Hal Arkes and Catherine Blumer showed in 1985 that people keep going with something once they have spent money, effort or time on it, largely to avoid looking wasteful6. "We have already put two years into this" is a reason to feel bad, not a reason to continue.
- Active inertia. Donald Sull argued in 1999 that successful companies rarely fail by doing nothing. They fail by doing more of what used to work, faster. He named four things that harden with success: how leaders see the market, the way work gets done, ties to customers and staff, and values. He advised leaders to ask "What hinders us?" before asking "What should we do?"8
- Budgets that do not move. A 2012 McKinsey study of how large companies split capital between their businesses found that about a third of them moved almost nothing from one year to the next. Companies in the top third for reallocation earned, on average, 30% higher total returns to shareholders each year than those in the bottom third9. A plan that changes on paper but not in the budget has not changed.
- Nobody wants to stop things. In Sull, Homkes and Sull's 2015 study, eight in ten managers said their company fails to exit declining businesses or kill unsuccessful initiatives quickly enough4.
Staw and Ross's practical advice, in a 1987 Harvard Business Review article on knowing when to pull the plug, includes separating the person who made the original call from the decision to continue it7. In a reset, that means the leader who launched the old plan should speak last on whether it stays, and someone else should present the evidence.
Staw and Ross also offer a test any leader can run alone: if you took over this job today and found the project already running, would you back it or end it? And they warn that asking for honest reports is not enough. The person who brings hard news needs an explicit reward7.
When not to call a reset
A reset is expensive. It takes a day of the leadership team, weeks of attention after, and some trust each time. Resetting too often teaches the organization to wait out every plan. Do something else in these cases:
| The situation | Do this instead |
|---|---|
| One bad quarter, and the early signs are still healthy | Stay the course. Name the signs you are watching and the date you will look again. |
| The plan is right but nobody is doing it | Fix execution: fewer priorities, clear owners, a regular check-in. |
| One priority is off, the rest are holding | Adjust that priority in your normal leadership meeting. |
| You have already decided the new direction | Say so. Hold a session on how to carry it out, not a reset that pretends to be open. |
| Cash will run out before a new strategy could work | Deal with cash first. A reset needs time you may not have. |
| The business as designed cannot work | This is a pivot. Plan for a bigger change than one day can settle. |
| You reset less than six months ago | Check whether the last reset was carried out before starting another. |
The fourth row is the most common trap. A team that is asked for its view on a decision already made will notice, and it will be less candid next time.
Before the day: start with the diagnosis
A reset day goes wrong in one of two ways. Either the room spends the morning arguing about what happened, or it skips that argument and agrees a new plan built on the same mistaken belief. Both are fixed by doing the diagnosis work before anyone walks in.
Three things to prepare
- "What the plan assumed, and what happened." One page. List the three to five beliefs the current plan rested on. Next to each, the evidence since. This becomes the pre-read and the start of the diagnosis.
- A list of everything currently funded. Every priority, project and initiative, with its owner and what it costs in money and people. You cannot decide what stops without seeing what is running.
- Each person's view, collected privately. Before the day, ask the team what they think broke and where they expect to disagree, and keep the answers anonymous.
The last one matters most. In a group, people tend to follow whoever speaks first, especially someone senior, and they hold back doubts to avoid seeming difficult10. In a reset, the most senior person often launched the old plan. Private answers collected beforehand are the simplest way to hear what the team really thinks. McKinsey research on 1,048 major business decisions found that the quality of the discussion mattered six times more than the amount of analysis11.
Questions to ask before a strategy reset
Throughline asks the leader four questions about the decision, then asks the team to answer anonymously on their own devices, in about two minutes. These are the questions it uses.
For you, the leader
- What is the single hardest problem the new direction must solve?
- Which old bets are already off the table?
- Where will the team split on the new direction?
- Who carries the reset, and how many teams have to change?
For your team, anonymously
Each rated 1 to 5. Nobody sees who said what, including you.
- I am clear on the decision this retreat needs to make.
- I understand what broke and why.
- I can say what I really think with this team.
- I am confident we will follow through.
Then one open question: what is the most important decision this retreat has to make?
Who to invite
- CEOowns the new direction
- CFOsays what is affordable
- Head of product or commercialknows what broke
- The sharpest critic on the teamthe direction must survive them
- Someone close to customerscorrects the customer picture
How to use the four questions
- Answer the leader's questions honestly before the team does. The second question, which old bets are already off the table, is where you say out loud what is not up for discussion. Saying it early is fairer than letting the team find out in the room.
- Look for the split, not the average. If half the team rates "I understand what broke and why" at 1 and half at 5, that gap is the first thing the day has to close.
- Read the open answers for a named problem. If several people describe the same crux in different words, the diagnosis block will go quickly. If they describe different problems, give the diagnosis more time.
A reset runs on a short clock
| When | What happens |
|---|---|
| Day 0 | You decide to call a reset. Answer the four questions. Pick the date. |
| Days 1 to 4 | The team answers anonymously, about two minutes each. The pre-read and the list of everything funded are drafted. |
| Days 5 to 7 | Answers are in. The agenda is built around the splits. The pre-read goes out. |
| Within two weeks | The reset day. |
| Within 48 hours after | Managers hear the decision from their own leader. |
| Within a week after | The whole organization hears it. What stops has actually stopped. |
| 30, 60 and 90 days | Check the early signs, the owned priorities, and the triggers that would reopen the call. |
A sample strategy reset agenda
A full day, laid out by the same rules Throughline’s planner uses, before your team has answered anything. It spends the morning on the real problem, the decision and what stops, and the afternoon on what could break it and who carries it. Full day, 09:00 to 15:25, breaks and lunch included.
- 09:00
Welcome 10 min
- 09:10
Warm-up 10 min
- 09:20
Opening brief 20 min
Method: Read the brief, then talk
Done when: Everyone has reacted to the brief and named what they want to leave with.
- 09:40
The hardest problem 30 min
Method: Name the real problem
Done when: The crux is written in one sentence the room accepts.
- 10:10
Where we disagree 30 min
Method: What would have to be true
Done when: Each option has its conditions written and the room agrees which to test.
- 10:40
The decision 30 min
Method: Make the decision and pick the priorities
Done when: The call is made and the priorities are ranked.
- 11:10
Break 15 min
- 11:25
Cuts and trade-offs 30 min
Method: To fund this, what stops
Done when: No new commitment is unfunded and no funding source is vague.
- 11:55
Lunch 45 min
- 12:40
Stress test 30 min
Method: Assume it failed. Why?
Done when: The top three failure causes each have a named owner.
- 13:10
Warm-up 5 min
- 13:15
Risks and assumptions 20 min
Method: What could go wrong and who watches it
Done when: No high-impact risk is unowned or unwatched.
- 13:35
Break 15 min
- 13:50
Affordability check 20 min
Method: Can we afford what we just agreed
Done when: Total commitment fits capacity, or the room has explicitly accepted the overrun.
- 14:10
Order of work 20 min
Method: What has to happen before what
Done when: The order stands and nobody’s item secretly starts first.
- 14:30
Each team's part 30 min
Method: What each team owns
Done when: Each area knows what it owns.
- 15:00
Close and commitments 20 min
Method: What, so what, now what
Done when: The third round produced something with an owner.
- 15:20
Who made today work 5 min
Make one for your own situation Planning two days? The free planner builds both from your team’s answers.
Why it runs in this order
The morning goes diagnosis first, then options, then the call, then what stops. Teams that start with options argue past each other, because each person is solving a different problem. Naming the problem in one sentence first makes the rest of the day shorter. The afternoon then tests the call before handing it out: a stress test, the risks, whether it is affordable, and who owns each part.
Half a day or a day and a half
Half a day. Keep the "Opening brief", "The hardest problem", "The decision", "Cuts and trade-offs", the "Stress test" and "Close and commitments", with one break. That runs about three hours. It works when the direction is already clear and the job is choosing what stops.
A day and a half. End the first day after "Cuts and trade-offs", so people sleep on the decision before anyone tests it. Open the second morning with the "Stress test", then "Risks and assumptions", the "Affordability check", "Order of work" and "Each team's part", and finish with "Close and commitments". This suits a reset that also changes how the team is organized.
Running the day: four methods that do the work
The sample day names a method for every block. Four of them carry a reset. Here is how each one works and why.
1. Name the real problem
Write the problem in one sentence the room accepts. Rumelt warns against the most common substitute: a goal dressed up as a diagnosis1. "Grow revenue 20%" is a goal. "Our buyers moved to self-serve, and we still sell through a field team" is a diagnosis. A useful test: if the sentence could appear in any company's plan, it is not yet a diagnosis.
2. What would have to be true
When the room splits between options, stop arguing about which option is right. For each one, ask what would have to be true about customers, competitors, costs and your own abilities for it to be the best choice. A. G. Lafley and Roger Martin describe this in Playing to Win12. Then find the conditions the group doubts most, and agree how to test them. The argument turns from "I think" into "what would convince us".
3. To fund this, what stops
Every new commitment names what pays for it: money, people or leadership attention taken from something else. Use the list of everything funded. Go line by line and put each item in one of three groups: continue, cut back, stop. Each stop gets an owner and a date, like any other decision, or the work quietly continues. A reset that adds priorities without stopping any has not reset anything49.
4. Assume it failed. Why?
This is the pre-mortem, described by Gary Klein in Harvard Business Review in 200713. Tell the room the new direction has failed badly a year from now. Each person writes down every reason they can think of, in silence, for a few minutes. Then go round, one reason each, until the list is complete. Klein cites 1989 research by Deborah Mitchell, Jay Russo and Nancy Pennington: imagining an event has already happened improved people's ability to identify reasons for an outcome by 30%1314. It also makes doubt safe to voice. Klein adds that the exercise cools the confidence of people who are heavily invested in a plan, and makes the team quicker to spot early signs of trouble once the work starts13. Take the top three causes and give each an owner.
Two ground rules for a reset
- No blame for the old plan. It was a reasonable bet on what was known then. If the day turns into who got it wrong, people defend instead of think.
- The person who launched the old plan speaks last on whether it stays. This is the remedy for escalation of commitment, applied to the room7.
What the leader can say
The plan we set rested on a few beliefs, and at least one has turned out wrong. Today is not about who got it wrong. It is about naming what broke, deciding what we do now, and deciding what stops so we can afford it.
That work mattered, and it taught us something. The question is not whether it was worth doing. It is whether, knowing what we know today, we would start it now. Would we?
We have two options on the table and we are going in circles. Take each one in turn. What would have to be true for it to be the right call? Then we pick the condition we doubt most and agree how to check it.
Marta, the partner channel stops at the end of this quarter. You own the wind-down. The two people on it move to digital ordering. Does anyone see a reason this cannot happen by then?
So the new direction is: stop funding the western expansion and put the money into digital ordering. Greg owns it. We reopen this if digital orders are still under 25% of new customers by May. Does anyone disagree with how I have put it?
What you leave the strategy reset with
The new direction in one sentence, what stops to pay for it, and each surviving priority with an owner, a date and a measure.
- What stops is recorded as a decision too, with an owner, so the work actually ends.
- The plan drafts itself from what the room decided, and each team gets its own part of it.
- Owners check in from an email in one click. A missed check-in counts as off track, and their manager is told.
- Follow-up all year on how the plan is holding up. Or take the plan with you as a PDF or Markdown.
Decide in advance what would reopen the call
Every reset call should carry the condition that would reopen it: a measure, a level and a date. Annie Duke, in Quit, calls these kill criteria and recommends setting them before you start, while you can still think clearly about them15. They protect the new direction too. Without a trigger, every bad week becomes a reason to reargue the day. Staw and Ross list trouble defining what failure would look like as a warning sign that a leader is overcommitted7.
Telling the organization
A reset changes other people's work, so it is only finished when they understand it. Most leaders underrate this. In Sull, Homkes and Sull's 2015 study, nearly 90% of middle managers said top leaders communicated the strategy often enough, yet only 55% could name one of the top five priorities4. Frequency is not the problem. Clarity is.
John Kotter, in his 1995 Harvard Business Review article on why change efforts fail, called one of the most common mistakes "undercommunicating the vision by a factor of ten"16. His rule of thumb: if you cannot explain the new direction to someone in five minutes and get a reaction that shows they understand it, you are not done.
The same 1995 article set a bar for urgency. Well over half the companies he watched failed at the first step, and he judged urgency high enough only when about three in four of a company's managers were honestly convinced that business as usual would not work16. Plan an early result too: he found most people will not stay with a long change unless they see clear evidence within 12 to 24 months that it is working16.
The five things to say
- What you believed. The belief the old plan rested on.
- What changed. The evidence, in plain terms.
- What you are doing now. The new direction in one sentence.
- What stops. Named, with dates. People trust a reset more when they can see what it cost.
- What does not change. The purpose, the customers, and anything people might fear is going.
Say what stays, and mean it. Sull found that companies trying to change everything at once often broke strengths they still needed. His examples of recovery, such as Goodyear after the move to radial tires and IBM in the 1990s, changed in stages and built on what already worked8.
The order
The leadership team first, on the day. Then managers, from their own leader, within 48 hours, so they can answer questions before their teams ask. Then everyone, within a week. After that, repeat it in every regular meeting: Kotter found that leaders who succeed with change use every channel they have, and that visible behavior that contradicts the message undoes the words16.
A year ago we bet that our customers would keep buying through partners. They have moved to ordering online, and our numbers show it. So we are changing course: digital ordering is now the priority. To pay for it, the western expansion stops at the end of this quarter. What does not change is who we serve and why. Your manager will walk through what this means for your team this week.
Not legal advice. If what stops includes jobs, check employment law before you announce anything. Many countries require notice or consultation first. In the US, the WARN Act generally requires employers with 100 or more employees to give 60 days' written notice before a plant closing or mass layoff17. In the UK, proposing 20 or more redundancies at one establishment within 90 days triggers collective consultation of at least 30 days, or 45 days for 100 or more18. Talk to your lawyer before the reset day if cuts are likely.
Did it work?
A reset feels decisive on the day. That is not the test. Check these five things:
- What stopped, stopped. At 30 days, go down the stop list. Count how many items have actually ended, and whether their budget and people moved.
- Managers can say it. Ask ten managers, at random, to describe the new direction and name the top priorities in their own words. Compare their answers with what the room agreed.
- The early signs moved. Pick the two or three early signs from your diagnosis. By 90 days, are they moving the right way?
- The triggers were checked. On each reopen date, did someone look at the measure and report it, whatever it showed?
- The decision held. Count how often the reset call was reargued in leadership meetings without new evidence. Zero is the goal.
If a trigger fires, that is not failure. It is the system working. Hold a short session on that one call, not a new reset.
Strategy reset checklist
Deciding to call one
- Early signs and late signs point the same way
- Checked that the problem is the strategy, not execution
- Checked that it is a reset, not an adjustment or a pivot
- Honest about whether the new direction is already decided
The week before
- Leader questions answered, including what is off the table
- Team answers collected anonymously
- "What the plan assumed, and what happened" page written
- Everything currently funded listed, with owner and cost
- If job cuts are possible, legal advice taken
On the day
- No blame for the old plan
- The real problem written in one sentence the room accepts
- Options tested with "what would have to be true"
- Every new commitment names what stops to pay for it
- Pre-mortem run, and the top three causes owned
- Each call has an owner, a date and a trigger to reopen it
After
- Managers told within 48 hours, by their own leader
- Whole organization told within a week: the five things
- Stopped work confirmed stopped at 30 days
- Early signs and triggers checked at 30, 60 and 90 days
What leaders want settled before a strategy reset.
How is a strategy reset different from annual planning?
Annual planning sets next year from where you are, on a fixed date. A reset starts from a plan that is not working, whenever the signs say so. Most of the day goes on what broke, the new call, and what stops, and the agenda uses different methods for it.
Do we need to wait for the quarter to end?
No. Every week of waiting is another week the company runs on a plan that is no longer true. The team's questions take about two minutes each, and the day can follow within the week.
What if the team disagrees about whether anything is wrong?
Then find out before the day. The anonymous answers show how divided the team really is, and the agenda gives the disagreement its own block instead of letting it break the afternoon.
What happens to the old plan?
List everything it funds, then mark each item continue, cut back or stop. What stops is decided in the room and recorded with an owner and a date, so the work and its budget actually move. The new priorities take its place for every team.
How long should a strategy reset take?
A full day for most teams. Half a day works when the new direction is already clear and the job is deciding what stops. A day and a half suits a reset that also changes how the team is organized.
Is a mid-year strategy review the same thing?
Close. A mid-year review checks the plan; a reset is what you run when the review says the plan is wrong.
What does strategic reset mean?
A strategic reset is a deliberate stop to decide whether a strategy still fits reality and, if not, what replaces it. It keeps the purpose and changes the main bets. The term is also used in foreign policy; for a company or nonprofit it means rebuilding the diagnosis, the direction and what gets funded.
What is the difference between a strategy reset and a pivot?
A reset changes how you intend to win: the diagnosis, the main bets and what gets funded. A pivot changes the business itself: the product, the customer or the model. If you still serve the same purpose and mostly the same customers, it is a reset.
How do you know when to change strategy?
When early signs and late signs agree. Early signs move first: win rates, a new kind of competitor in lost deals, a priority that keeps slipping for the same reason. Late signs confirm it: revenue below plan twice, falling share. Check first that the plan was actually carried out.
Is the problem the strategy or the execution?
Ask whether teams did what the plan asked, and whether it worked where it was done well. If it was not done, fix execution. If it was done well and still failed, or a belief behind it has proved wrong, the strategy needs a reset.
How do you communicate a strategy reset?
Say five things: what the plan assumed, what changed, what you are doing now, what stops, and what does not change. Tell managers within 48 hours, from their own leader, and everyone within a week. Then repeat it in every regular meeting.
Sources
- Richard P. Rumelt, Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters, Crown Business, 2011.
- Eric Ries, The Lean Startup, Crown Business, 2011.
- Andrew S. Grove, Only the Paranoid Survive, Currency Doubleday, 1996.
- Donald Sull, Rebecca Homkes and Charles Sull, "Why Strategy Execution Unravels, and What to Do About It," Harvard Business Review, March 2015. hbr.org
- Barry M. Staw, "Knee-Deep in the Big Muddy: A Study of Escalating Commitment to a Chosen Course of Action," Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16(1), 1976. doi.org
- Hal R. Arkes and Catherine Blumer, "The Psychology of Sunk Cost," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35(1), 1985. doi.org
- Barry M. Staw and Jerry Ross, "Knowing When to Pull the Plug," Harvard Business Review, March 1987. hbr.org
- Donald N. Sull, "Why Good Companies Go Bad," Harvard Business Review, July to August 1999. hbr.org
- Stephen Hall, Dan Lovallo and Reinier Musters, "How to put your money where your strategy is," McKinsey Quarterly, 2012. mckinsey.com
- Cass R. Sunstein and Reid Hastie, "Making Dumb Groups Smarter," Harvard Business Review, December 2014. hbr.org
- Dan Lovallo and Olivier Sibony, "The case for behavioral strategy," McKinsey Quarterly, March 2010. mckinsey.com
- A. G. Lafley and Roger L. Martin, Playing to Win: How Strategy Really Works, Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.
- Gary Klein, "Performing a Project Premortem," Harvard Business Review, September 2007. hbr.org
- Deborah J. Mitchell, J. Edward Russo and Nancy Pennington, "Back to the Future: Temporal Perspective in the Explanation of Events," Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2(1), 1989. doi.org
- Annie Duke, Quit: The Power of Knowing When to Walk Away, Portfolio, 2022.
- John P. Kotter, "Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail," Harvard Business Review, March to April 1995. hbr.org
- US Department of Labor, "Plant Closings and Layoffs" (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act). dol.gov
- UK Government, "Making staff redundant: redundancy consultations." gov.uk
Written by Tom Olajide, Founder. Survey figures are quoted with the year they were collected. Last reviewed September 24, 2026.
How long has the plan been wrong?
When is it?
Which month?
Who's working on it?